But Is It Deception?

Page Maintainer: Wesley R. Elsberry

What Is Creation Science?

I have been going through this book quite slowly, exposing an obvious falsehood a day or thereabouts, posting the results to the FidoNet Evolution Echo. This is the collection of posts, lightly edited.

I'm going to be splitting these posts up on a page-by-page basis. Some pages contain more apparent untruths, and will have longer responses. 

• Page 1
• No observation of evolution?
• No documentation of any fact of evolution?
• Page 2
• No evolution at present?
• Horizontal variation not real evolution?
• No beneficial mutations?
• No observed speciation?
• Patterson on speciation?
• No mechanism of evolution?
• Page 3
• No mechanism of speciation?
• No transitional forms? Stanley quote.
• Page 4
• No true transitionals?
• No evolutionary progress?
• Raup quote.
• Gould 'vector of progress' quote.
• Circularity of fossil dating?
• Evolution not possible due to the 2LoT?
• Evolutionary entropy decrease?
• Page 5
• No evidence from similarity?
• Denton quote on molecular sequences.
• Page 6
• Recapitulation and vestigial organs.
• Fully warranted in context quoting?
• Argument from imperfection.
• AfI same as vestigial?
• AfI is not progress?
• No other evidence of evolution?
• Clearly no scientific evidence?
• If not evolution, then creation. Futuyma quote.
• Page 7
• Evidence against evolution predicted by creation "model"?
• Page 8
• No real scientific evidence?
• No experimental proof?
• Comparison of "models"?